|
REPEAL
NAFTA!
This
is the only way to stop the NAU, SPP, Illegal Invasion
of The United States,
Mexican Truckers Invading U.S., NAFTA Superhighway,
and all of the Treasonous Acts of the SPP / NAU Evil
Powers That Be!
Congress
MUST Repeal NAFTA!
Call,
Fax, & E-mail Congress
Senate
House
of Representatives
Call
into C-SPAN's Washington Journal,
main
stream and alternative talk radio programs, etc,
Post this link and info everywhere!
Get the message out that the only way to stop all of
this is to
REPEAL
NAFTA!
Most
of the public knows nothing about any of this!
We
have to get this information out to everyone, awake
and asleep!
Washington
Journal LIVE Call In Phone Numbers
Please
pass on this information far and wide!
Refresh page frequently
to
get the latest information
11/2/07
The
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration (FMCSA)
often claims Mexican trucks are safer than U.S.
trucks, but available data doesn’t back up those
claims.
(Note from Melissa: Click
here to see an article regarding this.)
The Owner-Operator Independent Drivers
Association (OOIDA) requested that FMCSA provide
explanations as to why certain carriers have been
given approval to enter the United States when little
or no data is available to demonstrate how they have
fully complied with all applicable laws on safety and
security. The request was included in the
Association’s comments posted to the FMCSA public
notice in the Federal Register. That notice discloses
several Mexico-domiciled motor carriers that have
passed a Pre-Authority Safety Audit (PASA).
In review of the
published notice, OOIDA found it only shows whether
certain Mexican motor carriers passed certain
categories, but nothing about the data relied upon
to make those determinations.
OOIDA Executive Vice
President Todd Spencer commented, “It’s like
they are still making it up as they go along. They
just go ahead and say it passes, therefore it’s
supposed to be accepted as true.”
Because no specifics
were available in the public notice, OOIDA then
reviewed FMCSA’s SafetStat database and found
several red flags on the companies receiving a go
from PASA.
For example, one
approved carrier, Avomex International, shows a
pattern of tolerance for hours-of-service violations
by its drivers. During 172 inspections conducted
between Sept. 21, 2006, and Sept. 21, 2007, the
company was cited for 206 violations. Running five
trucks in the United States, that averages slightly
more than 40 violations per truck.
“And that gets an
approved PASA?” asked Spencer. “This is just one
of several examples we found that no authority
should be granted to any Mexican motor carriers.”
Mexican
truckers cite years of driving deep into U.S. -
say pilot program nothing new
10/29/07
Timeline
of the Progress
Toward a North American
Union - EXCELLENT!
North
American Union, SPP, NAFTA,
CFR Task Force Documents on NAU
More
Information on Mexican Trucks & Related Articles
Here
Mexico
Dynamite Truck Explosion Kills 34
9/10/07
By
JUAN MONTANO
PIEDRAS NEGRAS,
Mexico (AP) — A dynamite-laden truck exploded after
colliding with another vehicle on a busy highway in
northern Mexico's coal country, killing at least 34
people, including three reporters at the scene, state
and federal officials said.
Authorities said the
two vehicles crashed into each other Sunday evening,
drawing a crowd of curious onlookers as well as a
small army of police, soldiers, emergency officials
and journalists.
Shortly after the
crowd arrived, the wreckage caught fire, and the
dynamite exploded, sending a ball of fire into the sky
that consumed nearby cars and left a 10-by-40 foot
crater in the concrete, said Maximo Alberto Neri
Lopez, a federal police official.
He said more than
150 people were injured.
The force of the
explosion blew out the windows of a passenger bus a
quarter-mile away.
The dead included
three newspaper reporters from the nearby city of
Monclova, said Luis Horacio de Hoyos of the Coahuila
state Attorney General's Office.
It was unclear if
the explosive truck's driver was among the dead. Early
reports said he might have fled.
Coahuila state has a
large mining industry, most of it in coal.
The explosion raised
further questions about the safety of Mexican trucks.
This weekend, Mexico
began sending its first tractor-trailers across U.S.
territory under a long-delayed, NAFTA-mandated
program. Before, Mexican trucks were limited to
25-mile zone along the border.
Many in the U.S.
fought the change, arguing that Mexican trucks are
unsafe.
Randy Grider, editor
of Truckers News magazine, however, said Mexican
trucks with hazardous materials aren't included in the
new program.
"I think it
would be a very long time before the border would open
to hazardous loads," he said.
The truck that
exploded in Coahuila did not appear to be headed for
the U.S. It had recently left an Orica explosives
plant and was headed west to Coquimatlan, Colima, a
federal police officer who was not authorized to give
his name told The Associated Press by phone.
A woman who answered
the phone at Orica's offices in Monclova said all
company officials were at a meeting, and she could not
comment. The company is based in Australia and has
operations in 50 countries across six continents.
Associated
Press writer E.
Eduardo Castillo contributed to this report.
9/10/07
Thirty
four people are dead and 150 people are injured after
a horrific explosion along the Mexican border.
A truck carring
dynamite crashed into another big rig in the town of
Piedras Negras, just southwest of San Antonio.
The truck was not
crossing into the U.S., but the accident is raising
new concerns about border safety.
In an unrelated
development, Mexican trucks are now traveling deep
into America. It's part of the NAFTA agreement. But
teamsters spokeswoman Leslie Miller said this accident
raises new concerns.
"In a very sad
way this supports our argument that we should not be
allowing these dangerous trucks to travel wherever
they want throughout the United States," Leslie
Miller said.
Some
politicans plan to block funding for the cross border
program. The Department of Transportation said the
plan is safe.
Mexican truck carrying explosives for mining -- blows up
Regulation,
Free Trade and Mexican Trucks
By
Congressman Ron Paul, R-Texas -
9/10/2007
Another
NAFTA nail is about to be hammered into the coffin
Washington is building for the U.S. economy. Within
the next few days our borders will be opened to the
Mexican trucking industry in an unprecedented way. A
"pilot" program is starting which will allow
trucks from Mexico to haul goods beyond the 25 mile
buffer zone to any point in the United States.
Officials claim this is being done with utmost
oversight, but Americans still have their legitimate
concerns. Rather than securing our borders, we seem to
be providing more pores for illegal aliens, drug
dealers, and terrorists to permeate.
Not only that, but
the anti-competitive and burdensome yoke of
over-regulation of our industry at home is about to
send a lot more Americans to the unemployment lines.
The American Trucking industry has been heavily
regulated since 1935. The express purpose of The Motor
Carrier Act was to eliminate competition through
permitting, regulating tariff rates, even approving
routes. American trucking companies have been fighting
ever since for some relief from the substantial
regulatory burdens placed on them. Regulatory
compliance is the single most daunting barrier to
entry, and eats up huge amounts of profit. Now, to add
insult to injury, Mexican trucking companies, not
subject to the same onerous standards, will be allowed
to roll right in and squeeze American industry
further. This will severely undermine the ability of
American trucking companies to remain solvent.
The fact that this
is being done in the name of free trade is disturbing.
Free trade is not complicated, yet NAFTA and CAFTA are
comprised of thousands of pages of complicated legal
jargon. All free trade really needs is two words: Low
tariffs. Free trade does not require coordination with
another government to benefit citizens here. Just like
domestic businesses don't pay taxes, foreign
businesses do not pay tariffs -- consumers do, in the
form of higher prices. If foreign governments want to
hurt their own citizens with protectionist tariffs,
let them. But let us set a good example here, and show
the world an honest example of true free trade. And
let us stop hurting American workers with mountains of
red tape in the name of safety. Safety standards
should be set privately, by the industry and by the
insurance companies who have the correct motivating
factors to do so.
Free trade is not
the problem, and pseudo free trade is what is being
offered in the wrongly named North American Free Trade
Agreement and all its offshoots. The problem is a
government-managed economy and the burdensome
regulation that results. For our economy to remain
competitive in the world, we must remember what it is
to be truly free. We must lift the regulatory shackles
threatening to sink our industries into oblivion. Free
trade begins with freedom domestically, and we can't
afford to lose that.
Congressman Ron
Paul is a Republican representing the state of Texas.
HawaiiReporter.com
reports the real news, and prints all editorials
submitted, even if they do not represent the viewpoint
of the editors, as long as they are written clearly.
Send editorials to
mailto:Malia@HawaiiReporter.com
Illegal NAFTA Corporate International tribunals
don't over rule American rule of law &
constitution
9/7/07, The Cullen Law Firm, PLLC
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association Filed Petition in U.S. Court of Appeals Challenging U.S. Department of Transportation Decision to Open the Border to Mexican Trucks - Press Release
This
Press Release can also be found here.
Mexico
trucks program unpopular with 88 percent of poll
respondents
FMCSA
clears trucks for long-haul
operations between US, Mexico
9/7/07
Ole!
Mexican trucks given green light
to start crossing the border
Friday,
9/7/07
 |
| Would
you like to see the Mexican border
open up soon? |
| Absolutely.
I'd love access to a new
market; or be able to run less
costly truckers up here. |
| 17% |
|
|
| No
Way: Just think how Mexican
competition would erode our
domestic linehaul rates. |
| 83% |
|
|
|
Please
take the poll and pass the links
& information regarding this on to others!
Poll
Results as of 11:20 A.M.
Pacific time on Friday, 9/7/07
Text
appearing under photo:
"About
17 Mexican carriers are expected to receive
operating authority to haul into the US in the next
month."
WASHINGTON
-- Transportes Olympic of Nuevo Leon of Nuevo Leon,
Mexico and Stagecoach Cartage and Distribution from El
Paso, Tex are the first two for-hire carriers cleared
to cross deep into American and Mexican territory.
Thus marks the start
of a year-long cross border demonstration project that
will allow U.S. trucking companies to operate in
Mexico for the first time, and change the way a select
group of Mexican trucking companies operate in the
United States.
Currently, Mexican
carriers are restricted to a 20-mile zone north of the
border, where they have to transfer freight to an
American truck. Under the demonstration project, about
100 Mexican trucking companies, many of which already
operate daily in major U.S. cities like El Paso and
San Diego, will be able to travel beyond the
commercial zone.
The two carriers can
reportedly begin traveling uninhibited throughout each
country immediately.
The cross border
trucking demonstration project was to begin yesterday
with the release of the U.S. DOT Inspector General's (IG)
official report -- recently mandated by Congress
before the program could begin -- on the safety and
transparency of the pilot.
(Note from AVR: "pilot" meaning Pilot
Program or Project).
According to the
American trucking Associations, IG's report says the
FMCSA has taken the necessary steps to ensure the safe
implementation of the project.
"This
long-awaited project will protect public safety on
American highways as we work to both save consumers
money and help our economy," said John H. Hill,
administrator of DOT's Federal Motor Carrier Safety
Administration (FMCSA)."
Specifically, the IG
affirmed FMCSA's plans to go beyond statutory
requirements and check every truck that crosses the
border as part of the
demonstration, as the agency does with Canadian
carriers entering from the northern border. (Note
from AVR: "demonstration" meaning
Demonstration Program or Project).
The response
identified how federal truck inspectors are
coordinating with state and Customs and Border
Protection personnel to conduct the checks.
In the first 30 days
of the program, 17 trucking companies from Mexico are
expected to receive operating authority. Each
subsequent month until December, additional companies
will be added if they pass FMCSA's rigorous inspection
process and after a public comment opportunity.
Two weeks ago, a
petition to have the program blocked was filed in
court by the Teamsters and Public Citizen. The Court
dismissed the challenge, giving FMCSA the greenlight
to proceed.
But the
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association is
fighting to the end. In a last-ditch effort yesterday,
officials were in Washington lobbying the U.S. House
of Representatives to issue a stay against the Mexican
trucking pilot program.
(Note
from Melissa: Once again, the terms
"pilot", meaning either pilot program or
pilot project is used in this article, then, further
down, the same article refers to the Mexican
trucking invasion as a "demonstration"
program / project ! We have seen this time and
again! We believe this is being intentionally
done by all parties involved in pushing this
diabolical agenda, including the media, to confuse
researchers and those who are against this as to
whether this is a "pilot" program / project
or a "demonstration program / project! We
also know that pilot programs must go by statutes in
the CFR and that they also must have a public comment
period. They took public comments already
regarding this for 20 days, but per this article, they
must do so again, though it is unclear when, for how
long, or how many times they must do so. More
to come as soon as we find out! This
article does state that statutes and public comments
are involved here, not that they are really going to
abide by any of them, nor listen to their opposers.)
Truckers
protest program allowing Mexican carriers on US roads
9/7/07
Mexican
Trucks Win Approval to Go Beyond US Border (Update2)
9/7/07
US,
Mexico share truck business
9/7/07
US
Agency Approves Trucking Project With Mexico
9/7/07
Cross-border
trucking a go; OOIDA files
9/7/07
Congressman
Blasts Cross-Border Trucker Program
9/7/07
NAFTA's
trucking plan implemented
9/7/07
September
06, 2007 13:48PM
WASHINGTON -- Rep.
Peter DeFazio, D-Ore., flanked by a pit crew of House
Democrats, labor leaders and safety advocates offered
some advice Thursday to motorists - stay home.
And if you must
venture out, buckle in tight and watch your back.
The source of
DeFazio's concern is a new test program pushed by the
Bush Administration that would give permission to 100
trucking companies from Mexico to operate in the
United States. The program could go into effect as
soon as Friday and by DeFazio's estimate allow upwards
of 500 Mexican trucks access to America's interstate
system.
The White House says
allowing Mexican-owned trucks to roam across America
is required under the North Atlantic Free Trade
Agreement, the 1994 treaty liberalizing trade across
the continent. Administration officials insist that
Mexican trucks are safe.
DeFazio vehemently
disagreed on both counts.
``In Mexico there is
very little rule of law as it relates to this industry
or these drivers,'' he said during a Capitol Hill news
conference.
Drivers, he said,
could work 10 hours in Mexico, cross the border and
drive another 10 hours. Mexico's drug testing of
drivers is suspect and its inspection program for
trucks is leaking oil, he said.
All of that adds up
to serious danger.
``We have not found
that the Mexican system is equivalent to the United
State's system on anything but paper. And we have the
right in the United States of America to demand that
people come up to our standards if they want access to
our markets. In this case they have failed to do that,
plain and simple.''
And yet the program
is almost certain to go into effect. Despite efforts
by DeFazio and others, Congress has failed to pass
legislation to stop the program. A bill by DeFazio
breezed through the House 411-3 earlier this year but
is stalled in the Senate.
Efforts to block the
program in court have also failed. A federal appeals
court ruled last week that the program could move
forward.
DeFazio, who chairs
the Transportation Committee's Highways and Transit
Subcommittee, complained that the Bush Administration
has ignored bi-partisan concerns about allowing
Mexican trucks into the country.
``We are here to
raise our voices in protest yet one more time in the
hope that some one, somewhere downtown in the
administration is listening and cares, cares about the
safety of the American traveling public and cares
about the economic future of many in the country,'' he
said. ``This administration insists on defying the
will of Congress and the interest of safety in the
United States.''
Under NAFTA,
truckers from the U.S., Canada and Mexico must be
allowed to operate freely in all three countries.
Canadian trucks have had full privileges for years but
concerns about the safety of Mexican trucks have
blocked most access. Currently Mexican trucks can
enter the U.S. only at certain border crossing and are
forbidden from going more than 20 miles inside the
country.
The current pilot program is designed to study whether
opening the U.S.-Mexico border to all trucks could be
done safely.
DeFazio conceded that it might be difficult to stop
the trucks now, though he vowed to continue the fight.
``If they do open
the border and this begins, it does not make it an
ongoing or permanent program by any stretch of the
imagination. I just hope it doesn't take a horrible
tragedy to bring it to an end,'' he said.
--
Charles Pope
TEAMSTERS, NAFTA MEXICAN TRUCKS,
OPEN-BORDERS AND THE NORTH AMERICAN UNION
9/5/07
Tony Dolz is a founding member of the Minutemen border
security
and immigration reform grass-roots organization
("America's Biggest Neighborhood Watch") and
the State of California Legislative Liaison for the
Minuteman Civil Defense Corps (MCDC).
How
your Senators voted
on key amendments to the Senate's (AMNESTY
BILL)
so-called comprehensive
immigration reform proposal
Call,
Fax, & E-mail Congress
Senate
House
of Representatives
Here's
a Total Propaganda Piece:
KGBT 4 - TV Harlingen, TX
NAFTA Mexican Commercial Trucks Travel On U.S. Highways
Look
at the Names and Pictures
of the People Who Brought You This Shiny, Happy
Pro - Mexican Truck Article / TV Report!
Here's
the REAL TRUTH as Testified to in Front of Congress!
More
Truth Here:
Latest
News Articles on
Mexican Truckers Invading U.S.
Click
Here!
More
information and related articles here.
SENATOR
JOHN EDWARDS'
STATEMENT
ON BUSH’S OPEN HIGHWAYS INITIATIVE
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE
September 3, 2007
CONTACT:
Colleen Murray 919 - 636 - 3203
Chapel
Hill, North Carolina
– Senator John Edwards today criticized the Bush
administration’s open-highways initiative that would
allow Mexican trucks to travel freely within the
United States. The initiative is expected to go
into effect this week, unless it is blocked on
Wednesday by the Department of Transportation’s
Inspector General.
Edwards released the following statement:
“Our trade policies should put workers and families
first. Opening America’s highways to Mexico’s
long-haul diesel trucks puts American jobs and safety
at risk. The Department of Transportation has the
power to block the program. I urge them to use
it.
“Multinational corporations and their Washington
lobbyists greased the way to extend NAFTA onto
American highways and streets, without regard for the
impact on the environment or on the safety of
America’s workers and families. Last month, an
audit found that the database used to monitor Mexican
drivers with license convictions – known as the
‘52nd State System’ – has failed to record
thousands of convictions. Mexican diesel trucks
will not be required to meet the stricter emissions
standards of states like California.”
Under the NAFTA-related open-highways initiative, two
Mexican trucking companies are initially expected to
participate, with 22 more Mexican trucking companies
rolling on American roads within a month.
Congress passed a law in May requiring that the Bush
administration certify that safety and other reporting
systems have been implemented before the borders are
opened under the new initiative.
Note:
More to come on how many trucking companies / trucks
will be on the road, as from what I have read the
above numbers citing only 2 companies seems extremely
low. Melissa
Deal
develops Canada's NAFTA Superhighway
Here
come Chinese containers to Great White North -
9/4/07
Name
changed to hide 'Superhighway'?
Secret
Document Reveals Original Moniker of 'Super Corridor'
- 9/2/07
Superhighway?
WHAT superhighway?
Teamsters
fighting cross-border trucking
Mexican
truckers expected
to soon be hauling through U.S.
Read
comments from readers
and leave your comments here.
Court
denies emergency motion to stop NAFTA trucks pilot
Posted:
9/2/2007
Press
statement
Download court
decision
More
about NAFTA trucks
A
federal appeals court denied an emergency motion to
stop the Bush administration’s pilot project for
allowing Mexico-domiciled trucks to operate in the
U.S., which the administration could allow as early as
September 6.
The
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied an emergency
motion filed by Public Citizen, the International
Brotherhood of Teamsters and other groups, asking the
federal court to block the start of a U.S. Department
of Transportation’s pilot program. The pilot program
will allow a select number of Mexican trucks into the
United States to carry cargo beyond the narrow zones
near the border to which their operations are
currently limited.
The
court’s ruling does not address the merits of the
lawsuit itself, which alleges that the program
violates a law Congress passed
in May and fails to ensure the safety of American
drivers. That lawsuit will proceed, and the
court will address the lawfulness of the pilot program
after full briefing and argument.
Groups
sue to stop NAFTA truck pilot program
Posted:
8/29/2007
Download
the emergency
motion for stay
and the petition
for review
More
Resources:
Comments
Testimony
Articles
Background
Information
Briefs
Fact
Sheets
Legislation
Letters
Other
Helpful Sources
Press
Releases
Statements
Lou
Dobb's Tonight Transcript:
The
State of American Labor
Aired September 3, 2007 - 18:00 ET
Lou
Dobbs Transcripts
Videos
- Click Here
Timeline
of the Progress
Toward a North American
Union - EXCELLENT!
North
American Union, SPP, NAFTA,
CFR Task Force Documents on NAU
More
information and related articles here.
Mexican
Truckers Set to Invade U.S.
From
CNN'S "Lou Dobbs Tonight" 8/30/07
Transcript:
In
court papers, DOT says -- quote -- "Further delay
in complying with our NAFTA
motor carrier commitments
would cause considerable harm to our relationship with
Mexico, an important trading and diplomatic
partner."
ROMANS:
Trucks from Mexico could soon be going through
America's heartland, raising critical safety and
national security concerns. We will have that story.
ROMANS:
The Teamsters Union, the Sierra Club and Public
Citizen are fighting plans to open U.S. highways to
Mexican trucks.
The Teamsters filed suit in the Ninth U.S. Circuit
Court of Appeals to block an administration plan
allowing Mexican trucks deep into this country as
early perhaps as Saturday. Teamsters president Jimmy
Hoffa called it a slap in the face to American workers
opening highways to potentially dangerous Mexican
trucks on Labor Day weekend.
Opponents of the plan also warn the Mexican big rigs
are not subject to U.S. safety standards. And Mexican
trucks crossing into America's heartland could further
compromise border security.
Lisa Sylvester reports on this latest battle.
(BEGIN VIDEOTAPE)
LISA SYLVESTER, CNN CORRESPONDENT (voice-over): The pilot
program to allow Mexican trucks into the
American heartland could start this weekend or early
next week. And, over the next year, more than 500
Mexican semi-trucks could be allowed on to U.S.
highways, over the objections of the Teamsters Union,
environmental and safety watchdog groups, and
lawmakers.
(Note from AVR: Due to conflicting written
information in articles and documents, including
statements made by FMCSA and DOT, it is unclear
whether this is a "pilot program" or a
"demonstration program" as it is being
referred to as both of these. A "Pilot
Program" would entail Congressional
oversight. It is also referred to as a "Demonstration
Project" or
"Demonstration
Program",
according to the official
documents we have read! More to come about
this asap.)
YVETTE PENA LOPEZ, TEAMSTERS UNION: We're going to
have these ticking time bomb trucks on our highways.
They're not going to be inspected. Not every single
truck can be inspected that comes across our border.
We don't know who is driving these trucks.
SYLVESTER: An August report by the Department of
Transportation's inspector general found Mexico has no
certified testing laboratories for drug and alcohol
testing of drivers. And systems used to track
convictions of Mexican commercial drivers contain data
inconsistencies.
Others have raised concerns, including hours of
service and English proficiency.
BONNIE ROBIN-VERGEER, PUBLIC CITIZEN: Our view is that
this program should be halted until the safety
standards are addressed and the program is actually
done right.
SYLVESTER: Last month, the House passed a measure that
would block funding for the pilot
program.
TODD SPENCER, OWNER-OPERATOR, INDEPENDENT DRIVERS
ASSOCIATION: The House of Representatives, both
Republicans and Democrats, voted unanimously to cut
off funds for this pilot project.
Yet, and then as quickly as they did that, they went
home on recess, and while they're gone on recess, the
administration is moving steadily ahead.
SYLVESTER: The Department of Transportation did not
make anyone available for an interview, but in a
statement said -- quote -- "The department's
cross-border truck demonstration program will have no
impact on safety, given the thorough pre-screening and
safety inspections that every truck from Mexico will
have to endure."
In court papers, DOT
says -- quote -- "Further delay in complying with
our
NAFTA motor carrier
commitments
would cause
considerable harm to our relationship with Mexico, an
important trading and diplomatic partner."
Source
More
Lou Dobbs Transcripts
Public
Citizen is
a group featured on Lou Dobbs which opposes Mexican
truckers invading the U.S. and is part of several
groups which have filed a motion in court for an
emergency stay to stop these trucks from rolling into
the U.S. as early as Saturday, September 1, 2007,
Labor Day weekend.
Groups to Court:
Stop NAFTA Truck Pilot Program
(Note
from AVR: Due to conflicting written information
in articles and documents, including statements made
by FMCSA and DOT, it is unclear whether this is a
"pilot program" or a "demonstration
program" as it is being referred to as both of
these. A "Pilot
Program" would entail Congressional
oversight. It is also referred to as a "Demonstration
Project" or
"Demonstration
Program",
according to the official
documents we have read! More to come about
this asap.)
Once
again, the Bush administration is trying to open U.S.
highways to Mexico-domiciled trucks, violating a law
Congress passed in May and disregarding the safety of
American drivers.
Five
groups - Public Citizen,
the
International Brotherhood
of Teamsters,
Sierra Club, Environmental Law
Foundation and the Brotherhood of Teamsters, Auto
and Truck Drivers, Local 70 - filed
suit today in California to delay the
program, which is scheduled to take effect as early as
Sept. 1.
Aug.
29, 2007
Groups
Sue to Block NAFTA Truck Pilot
Program
Bush
Administration Ignoring Congress;
Mexico-Domiciled Trucks May Have Full Access
to the Nation’s Highways as Early as Saturday
LEARN
more.
VIEW
the petitioners’ emergency motion for stay.
VIEW the
petition for review.
No. 03-358
United States Dep't of Transportation
v. Public Citizen - Petition
View PDF Version
Sierra Club Lawsuits
Case Updates:
June
1, 2004
In early June the
Supreme Court gave the Bush Administration a green
light to allow outdated and polluting Mexican trucks
onto American highways. The decision upholds a NAFTA
requirement that trucks be allowed free rein on U.S.
highways despite non-compliance with the Clean Air Act
and other U.S. clean air laws. Sierra Club had
originally stepped in as a friend of the court to stop
any weakening of environmental protections.
Unfortunately, the decision means that many
communities are going to experience even dirtier air
as these outdated trucks hit the road.
April
1, 2004
The Club joined with
a diverse coalition as a friend of the court to urge
the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold a ruling that the
Department of Transportation (DOT) must comply with
domestic laws requiring a full assessment of the
environmental and public health threats that might
result from permitting a huge new influx of heavy
trucks from Mexico. The coalition is defending a Ninth
Circuit Court of Appeals decision that held that the
transportation agency violated federal laws by failing
to conduct a thorough review of the environmental
impacts of the truck traffic. Because most trucks used
to haul freight from Mexico are older and less subject
to emissions controls, they are likely to emit much
more deadly particulate matter and nitrogen oxides
than U.S. trucks. The Supreme Court agreed last
December to review the case at the request of the Bush
administration. A decision is expected in June 2004
following oral arguments in April.
Source
Five
groups - Public Citizen,
the
International Brotherhood
of Teamsters,
Sierra Club, Environmental Law
Foundation and the Brotherhood of Teamsters, Auto
and Truck Drivers, Local 70 - filed
suit today in California to delay the
program, which is scheduled to take effect as early as
Sept. 1.
Complaint
for Temporary Preliminary and Permanent Injunctive
Relief
and Declaratory Judgment
from Environmental
Law Foundation, a California-based
nonprofit organization which works to enforce
environmental laws (such as Proposition 65) against
polluters.
More
from Environmental Law Foundation:
May
02, 2002: Suit
Seeks to Halt Bush Plan On Entry of Mexican Trucks
May
01, 2002: PRESS RELEASE:
Groups Seek to Halt Bush Administration
from Allowing Environmentally
Unsafe Trucks from Mexico
on U.S. Highways
SPECIAL
REPORT:
OOIDA Seeks Injunction of Cross-Border Program
Tuesday, April 24,
2007 – The
Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Association,
along with five other groups, filed a lawsuit
seeking an injunction of the Bush administration’s
cross-border program – set to kick off within
days.
OOIDA, along with
the Sierra Club; Public Citizen; the Environmental
Law Foundation; the International Brotherhood of
Teamsters; and the Brotherhood of Teamsters Auto and
Truck Drivers Local 70, filed the suit in the U.S.
District Court for the Northern District of
California, San Francisco-Oakland Division, late
Monday, April 23.
The lawsuit
challenges the federal government’s adoption and
implementation of a pilot
program authorizing up to 100 Mexican motor
carriers – with an unlimited number of trucks –
to perform long-haul operations within the U.S.
The plaintiffs
claim in the lawsuit that the program is in
violation of public notice and comment requirements
federal law imposes on pilot
programs.
“We have
strongly opposed this program since first
introduced, and in particular, the secretive nature
in which it has been presented by the DOT,” said
OOIDA Executive Vice President Todd Spencer.
“The DOT has
still not answered questions about verification of
drivers’ records, drug and alcohol testing, hours
of service, cabotage, inspections and insurance.
They make general statements about audits of Mexican
motor carriers, but have shown nothing that should
make the American public feel confident that they
have fulfilled all the obligations necessary before
moving forward.”
The groups are
asking the court for an injunction of the program
until the Department of Transportation and the
Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration comply
with the law by providing public notice of the
pilot program and an
opportunity for the public to comment. If the
departments don’t comply, the plaintiffs want the
program to be set aside as unlawful.
The lawsuit runs
down the events leading up to the opening of the
border to 100 Mexican motor carriers.
Following a Feb.
23 announcement by Transportation Secretary Mary
Peters of a “year-long pilot
program” that would start in “about 60
days” details have been scarce, according to the
lawsuit.
The lawsuit
details statutory requirements federal agencies must
follow before putting a pilot
program into motion. One critical element is
public notification and the opportunity to comment,
according to the lawsuit.
The plaintiffs
claim this has not happened with the impending
cross-border program.
“The Secretary
has not provided detailed information about the pilot
program to the public,” the lawsuit states.
“Indeed, despite numerous requests by Congress and
by environmental, public interest, labor and
industry organizations to the Secretary and DOT for
information about the pilot
program, the details of the pilot
program have been shrouded in secrecy.”
The
lawsuit claims the defendants – the DOT, FMCSA,
Secretary Mary Peters and FMCSA Administrator John
Hill – have not complied with the requirements
governing pilot programs
outlined in Title 49.
A hearing for the
case had not been set as of Tuesday morning.
Click
here to
view the entire lawsuit.
(Note
from AVR: Due to conflicting written information
in articles and documents, including statements made
by FMCSA and DOT, it is unclear whether this is a
"pilot program" or a "demonstration
program" as it is being referred to as both of
these. A "Pilot
Program" would entail Congressional
oversight. It is also referred to as a "Demonstration
Project" or
"Demonstration
Program",
according to the official
documents we have read! More to come about
this asap.)
Videos
- Click Here
More
videos will be posted asap!
Top
of Page
A
Labor Day Message from General President James P.
Hoffa
August
31, 2007
This
Monday, we pay tribute to the millions of hardworking
men and women who make our world better and keep our
country vital. The recognition is well-deserved,
although a single day hardly seems adequate to address
the contributions of workers and the generations who
preceded them.
As
we approach Labor Day, the American labor movement is
reinvigorated and working for profoundly important
things: the continued existence of the middle class
and our national safety. I’m proud that the 1.4
million members of the Teamsters Union are at the
|